ByNitish Singh-May 2 2018.798 Figure 1 Photo Approval of the broadcasting company headquartered in Hong KongAccording to ComputerWorld the Tvb returned to the Federal Court for a scheduled hearing for its Iptv blocking appeal. The judge claimed that “the object of this device [ the set-top boxes ] is to make a broadcast available in this country that is not covered by copyright. “” If 10% of the content infringed content, how do you claim that the primary purpose is copyright infringement? “He was wondering. Despite the findings of the Judge, Tvb claims the Iptv companies are violating the rights of the client. Tvb lawyer Julian Cooke told the court that the broadcasts are replicated on foreign servers before they are transmitted on Australian set-top boxes. In Iptv services, this same feature is also available which makes Tvb question the nature of those live broadcasts. Judge Nicolas ruled that, after close examination, his decision could take several months.