When does ‘ Star Wars: Edge of the Galaxy ‘ open at Disneyland?Catherine Northington More Articles August 06 2014 2/2.047 The “climate change” definition is not new. We have been warned for years about the adverse impact widespread emissions and industrial activities can have on the environment. But what about the effect of what goes through our diets on the environment? A recent report by the National Academy of Sciences’ Proceedings found that livestock production is one of the world’s most important driving factors behind climate change. Livestock production has been shown to exacerbate polluting rivers of air quality and is currently the world’s largest use of the Guardian’s land data. “Livestock farming” as described in the Encyclopedia Britannicaraising of animals for use or enjoyment “ usually for the purpose of manufacturing meat and dairy. This practice writes that The Guardian is responsible for producing more greenhouse gasses (methane and nitrous oxide) than all the carbon dioxide emitted by combined car trains and planes. In 2012 for 7.1 billion people about 70 billion animals were raised as livestock. The human population is expected to increase by 35 per cent between 2006 and 2050, according to Forbes. During the same era the livestock population is projected to double. Since livestock production is determined by the general population researchers ‘ dietary patterns, they believe that the production of meat and dairy products will also increase as the human population increases. A boom in livestock production will cause a proportionate increase in greenhouse gas emissions, posing a major threat to our climate that some scientists claim may be. With this study in mind, several experts are suggesting a worldwide reduction of meat and dairy intake in an effort to preserve the environment. Such experts agree that a widespread reduction in meat consumption will reduce demand, which in turn will lower livestock production rates, thereby tempering the adverse effects of these activities on the climate. “We have shown that reducing meat and dairy consumption is key to reducing agricultural climate emissions to safe levels,” says a researcher at Chalmers University of Technology Sweden, Fredrik Hedenus. “Small dietary change can be long in coming. We should already think about how we can make our diet more climate friendly. “In the pecuniary sense, downgrading our meat intake would not only be environmentally beneficial, writes Forbes but would also serve us well. A cultural change from meat and dairy products to meat alternatives would ease the global water crisis. While meat alternatives are more labor-intensive suggesting that focusing on this sector will create more employment as well as more professional jobs. Livestock workers in alternative meat industry may easily be retrained for careers. Although scientists promoting these improvements remain hopeful for the future, they acknowledge that such a widespread and fundamental dietary shift is not going to be easy and quick. Case in point: The NPR estimated the average American eats 270.7 pounds of meat per year in 2012. But researchers are hopeful that getting the word out about these opportunities will help the general public make the right decision for themselves and for the planet.
10 Quaint American Beach Towns to Visit 7 Beautifully Homemade Biscuits Recipes Here’s How To Get Your Children To Eat Healthy