You are leaving Facebook? Here Are the best alternatives to use on Facebook!New revelations about our favorite social media network have hit the Web during the last few days. The Cambridge Analytica debacle has found itself in an unknown territory to defend our privacy on Facebookdelete, its Facebook pages. Can you quit Facebook with no impact on your digital life? Are there viable tools and services that can be great Facebook alternatives? Read on to learn more.
Facebook Alternatives: The Best Digital Substitutions
Facebook has become an important part of our daily lives over the last decade or so. We all use it for different purposes though. Many of you use this network to establish contact with friends and relatives. Others use it as a messenger app and substitute video and audio calls for texting. Then there are those who enjoy reading the latest news or planning activities. As you can see, Facebook is very powerful in terms of functionality that promote our lives. This does not mean we can find a replacement though. There are other great options, as well. DiggApple NewsFlipboard-one of our news team’s personal favorites.
Facebook Messenger
Most of you use Facebook Messenger on your phones and tablets as a means of keeping in touch with others. You’ve probably noticed that this app is cluttered with choices that don’t really make any use of it. Additionally this is what drains the battery of your computer. So if you leave Facebook messenger you will experience some advantages. Signal is one of the best alternatives for Facebook regarding its Messenger app. This is a free messaging app that comes from security experts and is certified. You can rely on a strong encryption that prevents your communications from leaking out. Even if it comes for free it has no advertising or other annoyances. There’s a laptop version of Signal on top of that so you can quickly synchronize your messages across a number of devices. Many of you may still be thinking about switching to WhatsAppFacebook to extract any metadata. But avoiding it is safest.
Event Planning
.128.128 Our advice is to use Paperless PostDoodle to help you find the best time for a group of individuals. For example, you want to schedule a meeting for a group of your employees that works.
Birthday Reminders
.129.129 You can click on Events on the left (once you have logged in to Facebook) to export this bit of data. You can export the events to your calendar of choice at the bottom of this page. This includes Google Calendar and Apple Calendar from Microsoft Outlook. Clicking on the ‘ Learn More ‘ button will take you to a detailed explanation of how to do this action.
Marketplace
Groups
Groups One of Facebook’s key features is community. You are probably a member of a number of groups that are formed for various purposes. As such they are a great way to stay up to date on certain things or to exchange ideas with other people. This doesn’t mean that we can’t find numerous alternatives for this on Facebook. .130 A.M.
Last Thoughts
Not Facebook is about the world. There are several alternatives available on Facebook that are not only safer but also much easier to use. Just make the initial effort to make the jump. It is all smooth sailing from there. Be sure to tell us about other alternatives on Facebook in the comments section below. As always if you know other people who want to quit Facebook, feel free to share this article online. Thank you! Danish Court Sentences Popcorn Time Data Site Owner to Imprisonment
ByBill Toulas-January 16 2020.132 Popcorn Time information site owner must pay $67k and be locked up for six months in a jail. The Denmark Supreme Court ruled that simply providing information on how to pirate is a criminal offence. The Danish Supreme Court reached a verdict concerning “PopcornTime.dk” owner who was arrested back in August 2015. The court’s decision is a conditional six-month prison sentence which is the same as the defendant had appealed on a High Court decision in 2018. For addition, the mandatory 120 hours of community service and the previously imposed grant of $67,000 still remain. Since this is a decision of the Supreme Court it is the final step for the 40-year-old man on the legal path so that no appeal can be lodged unless the man is prepared to bring the case before a European court. The founder of the particular Popcorn Time website tried to defend himself by arguing that his constitutional right to freedom of expression, and more precisely Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, had been violated in previous decisions. The Supreme Court rejected these charges, arguing that the website run by the defendant provided the tourists with very precise and tailored information to help them engage in piracy. Even if there have been no infringements on the website itself, the court nevertheless finds that this is a criminal offence. The local anti-piracy group “Rettigheds Alliancen” welcomed this decision, as the ruling of the Supreme Court clears the cloud regarding contributory copyright infringements. Remember Popcorn Time was a popular software tool that offered its users a convenient way to automatically download and watch movie torrents fetch subtitles and check for pirated content through a user friendly interface. Thus the software did not host any infringing material and the websites that distributed the tool were not storing any files either and provided information on how to use it. This created a sense of protection for the operators which has been debunked in recent years by various courts. Denmark is only the latest addition to the global list but Europe’s first. Of which all of this regulatory vagueness confuses the owners and users of the website. What exactly does “facilitating piracy” entail, and why is it that the chances of someone using Popcorn Time (or any other software) to access copyright-free content are broken? How is a criminal offense merely to provide guidance on how to do something that isn’t even intrinsically or necessarily wrong? The Danish court notes that they will continue to consider the nature and purpose of websites and determine whether their owners are making money from advertising or not when examining cases like this so the situation is fairly convoluted from a legal point of view.ByBill Toulas-January 16 2020.132 Popcorn Time information site owner must pay $67k and be locked up for six months in a jail. The Denmark Supreme Court ruled that simply providing information on how to pirate is a criminal offence. The Danish Supreme Court reached a verdict concerning “PopcornTime.dk” owner who was arrested back in August 2015. The court’s decision is a conditional six-month prison sentence which is the same as the defendant had appealed on a High Court decision in 2018. For addition, the mandatory 120 hours of community service and the previously imposed grant of $67,000 still remain. Since this is a decision of the Supreme Court it is the final step for the 40-year-old man on the legal path so that no appeal can be lodged unless the man is prepared to bring the case before a European court. The founder of the particular Popcorn Time website tried to defend himself by arguing that his constitutional right to freedom of expression, and more precisely Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, had been violated in previous decisions. The Supreme Court rejected these charges, arguing that the website run by the defendant provided the tourists with very precise and tailored information to help them engage in piracy. Even if there have been no infringements on the website itself, the court nevertheless finds that this is a criminal offence. The local anti-piracy group “Rettigheds Alliancen” welcomed this decision, as the ruling of the Supreme Court clears the cloud regarding contributory copyright infringements. Remember Popcorn Time was a popular software tool that offered its users a convenient way to automatically download and watch movie torrents fetch subtitles and check for pirated content through a user friendly interface. Thus the software did not host any infringing material and the websites that distributed the tool were not storing any files either and provided information on how to use it. This created a sense of protection for the operators which has been debunked in recent years by various courts. Denmark is only the latest addition to the global list but Europe’s first. Of which all of this regulatory vagueness confuses the owners and users of the website. What exactly does “facilitating piracy” entail, and why is it that the chances of someone using Popcorn Time (or any other software) to access copyright-free content are broken? How is a criminal offense merely to provide guidance on how to do something that isn’t even intrinsically or necessarily wrong? The Danish court notes that they will continue to consider the nature and purpose of websites and determine whether their owners are making money from advertising or not when examining cases like this so the situation is fairly convoluted from a legal point of view.